Archive for movies

film flam: winter vacation edition 2

more movies from the last month… 

thomas the tank engine and the magic railroad: emmit zoned out to play with his actual lead-free thomas trains, but i was a deer in headlights. i’ve always said that even annoying movies or characters created for kids (think jar jar binks, then shudder if you’re over 7-years old) are acceptable so long as they are entertaining to their audience. emmit had no interest in this movie and he loooooves his thomas the tank engine old school videos. what oh what were they thinking to go live action for this? bring on the trains. that’s what my boy loves. 

notes on a scandal: i just didn’t get what the point was. i mean other than the oscar winning kate blanchett bitchslapping the oscar winning judi dench at the end of the movie. that was kind of awesome. i like dark movies, sad movies, challenging movies, but this story just wasn’t enjoyable or edifying in any way. it was like a trashy single white female dressed up with british accents.

paris je t’aime: felt just like a sampler plate at a restaurant, delightful but not necessary very substantial. after watching 18 short films about love in paris, i can’t imagine someone not struggling to want to book a flight right away. it’s a pleasing jumble. some work better than others, but even the bad ones are only 5-minutes long so there’s nothing to lose. alexander payne’s was my absolute favorite.

live free or die hard: a big dumb lug of a movie. okay, really, here’s the deal: i love action movies. sometimes the stupider the better. that drives josh a little crazy because he likes a little smarty-pants, not a lot necessarily, but just enough. josh loves the original die hard and likes the sequels well enough. he had to leave the room during this one. to do dishes. as for me, i was doing alright until the ludicrous fighter jet v. semi truck sequence. i mean, come on with that nonsense. bruce willis still has it as far as i’m concerned. he might be getting a little too old for all this nonsense, but i believed him. it’s just the “more is more” action sequences weren’t fun. there was no joy in it. after 20 years, the original die hard did more with 1 sky scraper than this movie did with the entire eastern seabord. i actually liked that there were real stunts with real stunt people rather than all the cgi that most action movies use now, but still – too much!

waitress: i was charmed by this pastel colored food porn fairy tale. it is sweet and funny and sad and just really pleasant. i liked the warmth and humor in the female camaraderie. i liked that the style faintly echoes early hal hartley (a favorite of mine). i liked the quirkiness and emotion. i liked keri russell and nathan fillion and the rest of the supporting cast. i liked that it deals with the misgivings felt by a pregnant woman and the transforming effects of motherhood.

sunshine: i think i want to applaud the filmmakers for trying to do something new with the somewhat tired sci fi genre, but i hesitate. i went into it a little nervous that it was going to get all creepy. nothing in the trailer suggested that it would, but i had a feeling. from the box and the trailer, i expected a taut psychological thriller, but nothing prepared me for the startling left turn into horror. the end was a bad trip with confusing strobe lights and confounding editing. i actually thought our dvd player was skipping. i tend to be able to suspend my disbelief pretty easily. that’s my movie watching super power: to be able to watch the worst dreck and still believe in the world of the movie, but the odyssey of stupidity within this plot, one bad decision piling on another threw me for a loop. i liked the 1st two-thirds of the film. it starts interestingly as a character study with a lovely ethereal quality that slams quickly into “what the hell?!” i cannot decide if i would recommend this movie because of the end. and yet, the great production design (i loved the ship), the interesting effects (not too computery) and the powerful way that they incorporated light into the story kept me thinking about it after it was over and seemed to push out the horror elements (like the very freaky quick cuts and monster/not a monster). so, yeah, torn.

Comments (2)

film flam: winter vacation edition

i’ve been kind of watching a lot of movies lately. not pre-emmit level, but at least regularly, mostly on dvd. my hope is to keep these mini-reviews especially mini since i’m dangerously behind. but we all know i’m chatty so that might not happen.

reign of fire: not a good movie by any means, but terribly entertaining… laughably enjoyable even. lots of dragons! lots of fire! stuff gets blown up! might be that it takes itself a touch seriously and would benefit from even more camp. christian bale works his serious method-magic while matthew mcconaughey tries admirably to fill the camp void with one of the most over-the-top performances i’ve ever seen. guilty pleasure movie, for sure.

rescue dawn: another christian bale movie. i do get on my sexy actor kicks, don’t i? i’m kind of torn here. i don’t know a lot about the director, werner herzog, except that he comes from a documentary background, which informs this movie completely. very little embellishment on the story, which is mostly pretty good. it feels real. excellent performances from bale and steve zahn, who i would love to see get some attention from this. the movie is often great with rare missteps. the scenes in the pow camp are quiet and suffocating; the actual rescue is desperate and painful; the last 10-minutes were annoying and didn’t seem to fit the tone of the rest of the thing. there’s maybe a lack of depth to bale’s character that becomes apparent at the end.

hairspray: 1st of all, i would pay lots and lots of money to see christopher walken singing and dancing so i was sold right away. 2nd of all, john travolta is no divine, but he didn’t quite annoy me either. he almost played it too straight, like he was a woman rather than the wink wink way that divine played the same role in the original john waters’ version. other than the excellent casting, the movie is enjoyable enough…bright, bouncy, goofy…just the right amount of fluffy escapism.

curse of the golden flower: where to start with this gorgeous mess? i didn’t not like it, being a sucker for the opulence of zhang yimou films (hero, house of flying daggers), but wow! the muddle of the plot almost overwhelmed the technical brilliance of the production design. and the lack of emotional center succeeds at overcoming the wildly charismatic gong li and chow yun fat. hollow, but lovely looking. oh! very excited to learn that zhang has been hired to direct the opening and closing ceremonies of the 2008 beijing olympics.

last king of scotland: blah blah blah…i don’t want to talk about forrest whitaker, who well deserved the oscar he won. his performance was really really quite a revelation of complexity – a study on human nature rather than an indictment, but it kind of is the only thing holding this movie together. james mcavoy is also very good, but i kind of hated that our point of view is through the eyes of a pretty unsympathetic spoiled everyman white guy. as if a story about africa can’t be told without a white colonial perspective (see also: blood diamond). part biopic, part history lesson, part thriller, part too many things that never meld together.

starter for 10: what i wanted was an amiable romantic comedy and to have something to compare james mcavoy’s last king of scotland performance with (in addition to becoming jane and, more recently, atonement). what i got was moments of sweetness, but nothing new. mcavoy did not disappoint me. he has a charm to him that seems to grow as he gets bigger and better roles. the 80’s new wavey music was fun to hear, but ultimately, the movie was just too formulaic to hold my attention.

Leave a Comment

Older Posts »